Rajesh Ranjan, Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Staff v. Selection Commission, Ranchi
Case Details
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 109 of 2021 --- Santosh Chaudhari … … Petitioner 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Rajesh Ranjan, Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Staff Versus Selection Commission, Ranchi 3. Vandana Dadel, Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi …. … Opposite Parties With Cont. Case (Civil) No. 114 of 2021 --- 1. Bittu Kumar 2. Sanjay Paswan 3. Premchand Gupta … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Rahul Sharma, the Principal Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. Ashok Kumar Khaitan, Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Ranchi 4. Rajesh Ranjan, Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Ranchi 5. Rahul Kumar Sinha, Deputy Commissioner, Giridih 6. Vandana Dadel, Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi …. … Opposite Parties With Cont. Case (Civil) No. 186 of 2021 --- 1. Bapi Karmakar 2. Prasenjit Maji … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Rahul Sharma, the Principal Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. Ashok Kumar Khaitan, Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Ranchi 4. Vandana Dadel, Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi …. … Opposite Parties 1 With Cont. Case (Civil) No. 192 of 2021 --- 1. Santram Singh 2. Nilesh Kumar Yadav 3. Vikash Tiwari 4. Sandeep Kumar 5. Om Prakash Yadav 6. Ashwani Kumar Dubey 7. Vimlesh Singh 8. Santosh Kumar 9. Santosh Kumar Yadav 10. Dinkar Prakash Pandey 11. Rajesh Kumar Singh 12. Bhupendra Pratap Singh 13. Parmeshwar Bhange 14. Prakash Kumar Jha … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Rahul Sharma, the Principal Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. Ashok Kumar Khaitan, Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Ranchi 4. Vandana Dadel, Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi …. … Opposite Parties With Cont. Case (Civil) No. 193 of 2021 --- 1. Kavita Sharma 2. Neelam Sarita 3. Partha Mukhopadhyay 4. Pritam Bisui 5. Taraknath Pan 6. Sabyasanchi Chakraborty 7. Avik Kumar De 8. Somnath Ganguly 9. Baban Gope 10. Chandan Mukherjee 11. Ranjit Kumar 12. Ajay Kumar Singh 13. Dr. Mahesh Kewat 14. Lalan Kumar 15. Ajay Kumar Tiwari 16. Gulab Singh 17. Chakradhar 18. Bandana Kumari 19. Neeta Bhadoriya 2 … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Rahul Sharma, the Principal Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. Vandana Dadel, Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi With Cont. Case (Civil) No. 216 of 2021 …. … Opposite Parties ---
Legal Reasoning
1. Om Kapoor 2. Kamlesh Kumar Rawani 3. Dharnidhar Singh 4. Shiv Shankar Mahto 5. Rahul Kumar 6. Rajendra Kumar Srivastav 7. Moneshwar Vikash Verma 8. Mahendra Kumar 9. Rahul Kumar 10. Prabhat Kumar 11. Shyam Kumar Singh 12. Vivek Kumar 13. Tiru Hembram, 14. Shubham Kumar 15. Bikram Kumar Sharma Versus … … Petitioners 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shri Ajoy Kumar Singh, Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 3. Shri Ashok Kumar Khetan, Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Ranchi. 4. Shri Yogendra Dubey, Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Ranchi. …. … Opposite Parties With Cont. Case (Civil) No. 290 of 2021 1. Lakshman Kumar 2. Sunil Kumar 3. Nageshwar Ram 4. Sohan Mahto 5. Shyam Deo Mahto 6. Sandhya Verma 7. Rupesh Kumar Das 8. Manoj Kumar 9. Anil Kumar 10. Prayag Kumar 3 11. Sweta Yadav 12. Jiwadhan Choudhary Mahato 13. Suman Kumar 14. Vikash Kumar Pathak 15. Manoj Kumar Singh 16. Nikita Kumari 17. Rupa Kumari 18. Basanti Kumari 19. Niteshawari Kumari 20. Avinash Kumar 21. Kunwar Prajapati, 22. Basudew Kumar Mandal 23. Pawan Kumar 24. Badari Prasad Mehta 25. Amit Kumar 26. Prakash Mehta 27. Ranjeet Kumar Lohar 28. Md. Zameer Alam 29. Umashankar Verma 30. Ashutosh Kumar Pandey 31. Vikash Kumar Soni 32. Rajesh Prasad 33. Sushma Kumari 34. Ghanshyam Prajapati, 35. Sanjay Kumar 36. Mukesh Kumar Rana … … Petitioners 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shri Ashok Kumar Khetan, Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Versus Selection Commission, Ranchi. 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Giridih. …. … Opposite Parties With Cont. Case (Civil) No. 309 of 2021 --- 1. Pradeep Kumar Pandey 2. Sukant Kumar Ghoshal 3. Ratnesh Sharma 4. Anand Singh Yadav 5. Biplab Hui 6. Sibunath Bhunia 7. Neeraj Kumar … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Principal Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi …. … Opposite Parties 4 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioners : Ms. Anya, Advocate Mr. Amritansh Vats, Advocate Mr. Manoj Tandon, Advocate Ms. Neha Bhardwaj, Advocate : Mr. Rohit, A.C. to A.A.G.-I Mr. Ranjan Kumar, A.C. to Sr.S.C.-I Mrs. Vandana Singh, Sr.S.C.-III Ms. Neha Pandey, A.C. to Sr.S.C.-III Mr. Mukul Kumar Singh, A.C. to G.P.-III Mrs. Nirupama, A.C. to Sr.S.C.-II : Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate For the State For the JSSC Order No. 15 Dated: 01.05.2024 These contempt petitions have been filed for initiation of contempt proceedings as against the opposite parties alleging wilful violation of orders dated 23.11.2020, 14.10.2020, 06.11.2020 03.12.2020, 14.10.2020 and 19.02.2021 passed in W.P.(S) Nos. 1642 of 2020, 3486 of 2019, 3258 of 2020, 3482 of 2020, 3486 of 2019 and 136 of 2021 respectively. 2. Learned counsel for the respective petitioners jointly submit that during pendency of the present contempt petitions, the petitioners of all the contempt petitions have been appointed as Trained Graduate Teachers (TGT) in different subjects and categories. Thus, the orders passed in the aforesaid writ petitions have been complied by the opposite parties. 3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that the aforesaid orders of this Court have been complied, there is no need to further proceed in the present contempt matters. 5 4. The contempt proceedings as against the respective opposite parties are hereby dropped. 5. All the aforesaid contempt petitions are accordingly