✦ Jharkhand High Court

Jagdish Teli @ Jagdish Saw v. The State of Jharkhand

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner For the State : Mr. Sanjeev Thakur, Advocate : Mr. S.K. Srivastava, Addl. P.P. Order No.04 Dated- 02.05.2022 ------ Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Baghmara P.S. Case No.42 of 2021 (G.R. No. 2790 of 2021) registered under sections 271/273/420/471/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 47 (a) of Excise Act. The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in manufacturing of illicit liquor. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and are general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 12 of the anticipatory bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security of Rs.2,60,000/- and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.2,60,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Dhanbad, in connection with Baghmara P.S. Case No.42 of 2021 (G.R. No. 2790 of 2021) with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. Sonu/Gunjan- (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Jharkhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A No. 2796 of 2022). ← Search more judgments