✦ Jharkhand High Court · 20 Sep 2023

Rajesh Kumar Singh v. The State of Jharkhand

CR.M.P No. 1120 of 2023ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY5 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

In the result, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 99. In the result, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed. High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi Dated the 20th September, 2023 AFR/Sonu-Gunjan/- (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)

Judgment

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ….. For the Petitioner For the State : Mr. Soumitra Baroi, Advocate : Mr. P.K. Chatterjee, Spl. P.P. ….. By the Court:-

2.

Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with a prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding instituted against the petitioner including the Charge Sheet No. 01 of 2022 and order dated 01.11.2022, passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro whereby cognizance has been taken against the petitioner for the offences punishable under Section 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code, under Section 21 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act and Section 30 of the Coal Mines Act in connection with Chas (M) P.S. Case No. 35 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1115 of 2022, now pending in the court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro.

3.

The brief facts of the case is that the petitioner is the owner of the Truck bearing registration no. JH 10CH 4706 and it is alleged that 2 Cr.M.P. No.1120 of 2023 the said truck of the petitioner was transporting illegally excavated stolen coke dust loaded in the truck weighing about 45 tons.

4.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that after investigation of the case, police submitted charge sheet. Further, drawing attention of this Court to annexure-2 at page no. 45 of the brief, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Sub Inspector of Police, Chas Muffasil Police Station, Bokaro has submitted a report to the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro intimating therein that on physical verification of the document of ownership produced by Jagdish Prasad Agrawal, the document of ownership was found to be valid and consequent upon that, the seized coal has been released in favour of the owner of the same –Jagdish Prasad Agrawal. Drawing attention of this Court to the unimpeachable document kept at page no. 29 of the brief which is the tax invoice in connection with transportation of the coal, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the tax invoice also shows transportation of the seized coal from Abhiyan Coal and Coke LLP of the Jagdish Prasad Agrawal to Hira Ferro Alloys Ltd., Raipur, hence no illegality has been committed by the petitioner. It is therefore submitted that the entire criminal proceeding instituted against the petitioner including the Charge Sheet No. 01 of 2022 and order dated

01.11.2022, passed by learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro whereby cognizance has been taken against the petitioner for the offences punishable under Section 414/34 of 3 Cr.M.P. No.1120 of 2023 the Indian Penal Code, under Section 21 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act and Section 30 of the Coal Mines Act in connection with Chas (M) P.S. Case No. 35 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1115 of 2022, now pending in the court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro be quashed and set aside.

5.

Learned Spl. P.P. on the other hand opposes the prayer for quashing the entire criminal proceeding instituted against the petitioner including the Charge Sheet No. 01 of 2022 and order dated 01.11.2022, passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro whereby cognizance has been taken against the petitioner for the offences punishable under Section 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code, under Section 21 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act and Section 30 of the Coal Mines Act in connection with Chas (M) P.S. Case No. 35 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1115 of 2022, now pending in the court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro but fairly submits that upon verification of the documents, the ownership of the coal as claimed by the said - Jagdish Prasad Agrawal; was found to be valid.

6.

Having heard the submissions made at the Bar and after going through the materials in the record, in view of the fact that undisputedly the ownership of the said seized coal belongs to Abhiyan Coal and Coke LLP of which Jagdish Prasad Agrawal is a partner; this Court has no hesitation in holding that since the coal transported by the truck of the petitioner was genuine one 4 Cr.M.P. No.1120 of 2023 and had the valid tax invoice and the documents were found to be genuine by the police upon production of the same, the chances of conviction of the petitioner is remote and bleak, hence continuation of this criminal proceeding will amount to process of law.

7.

Under such circumstances, this Court is of the considered view that this is a fit case where the entire criminal proceeding instituted against the petitioner including the Charge Sheet No. 01 of 2022 and order dated 01.11.2022, passed by the learned Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro whereby cognizance has been taken against the petitioner for the offences punishable under Section 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code, under Section 21 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act and Section 30 of the Coal Mines Act in connection with Chas (M) P.S. Case No. 35 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1115 of 2022, now pending in the court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro be quashed and set aside.

8.

Accordingly, the entire criminal proceeding instituted against the petitioner including the Charge Sheet No. 01 of 2022 and order dated 01.11.2022, passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro whereby cognizance has been taken against the petitioner for the offences punishable under Section 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code, under Section 21 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act and Section 30 of the Coal Mines Act in connection with Chas (M) P.S. Case No. 35 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1115 of 2022, now pending in 5 Cr.M.P. No.1120 of 2023 the court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro is quashed and set aside.

Operative part

9.

In the result, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed. High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi Dated the 20th September, 2023 AFR/Sonu-Gunjan/- (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In the result, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 414; Coal Mines Act — s. 30.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Jharkhand High Court, on 20 Sep 2023. The bench was ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Jharkhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CR.M.P No. 1120 of 2023). ← Search more judgments