Bhairab Chandra Naik v. The Union of India & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Hence, both these writ petitions are allowed to be withdrawn
Judgment
Operative part
CORAM: SRI SANJAYA KUMAR MISHRA, C.J. SRI ANANDA SEN, J. --------- For the Petitioners: --------- Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate Ms. Aahna Bhardwaj, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Anil Kumar, Addl. S.G.I. For the State of Bihar: Mr. S.P. Roy, G.A.-Bihar 24/Dated: 21.03.2023 --------- Ms. Aahna Bhardwaj, learned counsel holding the brief for Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned counsel, would submit that in the meantime the petitioners have retired on superannuation and, therefore, they do not want to press these writ petitions. A withdrawal memo to that effect has been filed by the learned counsel. There is no objection to such prayer by the other side. Hence, both these writ petitions are allowed to be withdrawn. (Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, C.J.) Manoj/- (Ananda Sen, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.