The High Court
Case Details
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Transfer Petition(C) No. 05 of 2013 Mrs Arti Devi .... Petitioner(s) Ram Prasad Napit ... Opposite Party Versus Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): None For the opposite party : xxx 22.11.2013 This transfer petition has been filed for transfer of T(M) S No. 515 of 2012 from the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Dhanad to the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. From perusal of order dated 21.10.2012 it appears that on the earlier occasion also, no body appeared on behalf of the petitioner. This application is accordingly dismissed for non prosecution. Ambastha/- ( D.N.Upadhyay,J.)
Legal Reasoning
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Transfer Petition (C ) No. 6 of 2013 Sujata Nishad .... Petitioner(s) Sanju Kumar Nishad ... Opposite Party Versus Coram :
Legal Reasoning
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Gautam Kumar For the opposite party : xxxx 22.11.2013 This transfer petition has been filed for transfer of Matrimonial (T) Suit No. 08 of 2012 from the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Ranchi to the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Dhanbad. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and therefore this petition has become infructuous. In view of the above submission, this transfer petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Ambastha/- ( D.N.Upadhyay,J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Transfer Petition(C) No. 33 of 2013 Nisha Saboo .... Petitioner(s) Pankaj Saboo ... Opposite Party Versus Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Satish Kumar Deo For the opposite party : xxx 22.11.2013 Seen the office note from which it appears that the notice issued to the opposite party has been received by his father. Notice is deemed to have been validly served. Put up this case after two weeks awaiting appearance of the opposite party. Ambastha/- ( D.N.Upadhyay,J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Transfer Petition (C) No. 43 of 2012 Smt Vinita Jha .... Petitioner(s) Moti Kant Jha ... Opposite Party Versus Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. A.R.Choudhary For the opposite party : Mr. 22.11.2013 Heard the counsel for the parties. This transfer petition has been filed under section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure for transfer of Title Matromonial Suit No. 83 of 2012 from the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro, to the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Singhbhum East at Jamshedpur. It is submitted that even after service of notice, the opposite party has not appeared. In the year 2010, complaint case no. 3399 of 2010 was filed against the opposite party and he has filed the present matrimonial suit under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act after two years only with intention to harass the petitioner who is dependent on her parents and she will have to face hardships if the said matrimonial suit is permitted to continue at Bokaro. Considering the prayer, Title (M) Suit No. 83 of 2012 is recalled from the file of Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro and it is transferred to the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Singhbhum East at Jamshedpur. It is made clear that the Principal Judge Family Court, Singhbhum East at Jamshedpur, after receipt of the record shall issue notice to the parties so that they may appear and the court shall proceed with the trial. This transfer petition is thus allowed. Interim order passed by this Court stands vacated. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX at the cost of the petitioner, as prayed for. Ambastha/- ( D.N.Upadhyay,J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. ........... of 2013 ............... .... Petitioner(s) State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Versus Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 22.11.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused in connection with ........... case No. ............. for the offence registered under sections .......... of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals from ................ It is submitted that ..................... Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Considering above aspects of the matter, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ................. in connection with .........case No. ................. Ambastha/- ( D.N.Upadhyay,J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. ........... of 2013 ............... .... Petitioner(s) State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Versus Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 22.11.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused in connection with ........... case No. ............. for the offence registered under sections .......... of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals from ................ It is submitted that ..................... Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Considering above aspects of the matter, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ................. in connection with .........case No. ................. Ambastha/- ( D.N.Upadhyay,J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. ........... of 2013 ............... .... Petitioner(s) State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Versus Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 22.11.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused in connection with ........... case No. ............. for the offence registered under sections .......... of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals from ................ It is submitted that ..................... Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Considering above aspects of the matter, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ................. in connection with .........case No. ................. Ambastha/- ( D.N.Upadhyay,J.)