Sajjan Paswan v. The State of Jharkhand
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 2
Judgment
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, S.C.-I -- 02/16.04.2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying for a direction upon the respondent authorities to appoint the petitioner on the post of Chowkidar in Thakurgangti P.S. after voluntary retirement of his father from the post of Chowkidar in the same P.S under the district of Godda in view of the provisions enshrined under the Bihar Chowkidar Manual; inasmuch the father of the petitioner had nominated the name of the petitioner for such appointment after his voluntary retirement.
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has represented the concerned respondent, but no decision has been taken till date. 1
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that let the petitioner file a fresh petition before the respondent no. 7, so that a decision can be taken.
Operative part
Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the submissions made at bar, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the respondent no. 4 to treat this writ petition as representation and take a decision in the matter by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of such representation and any such decision shall be communicated to the petitioner. Further petitioner is directed to serve the copy of this writ application to the respondent no. 4 at the earliest.
With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.