Rohit Kr v. M/s SREI Equipment and Finance Ltd Room No. 12 & 13 2nd
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ------- : Mr. Rajiv Shekhar, Advocate Mr. Ashok Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the Applicant 05/Dated 04th July, 2022 --------------------------- Learned counsel for the petitioner, in course of argument, submits that during pendency of the instant application, an award has been passed and the same is also under question in this proceeding. This Court has raised the question of maintainability upon the learned counsel for the petitioner that after the award having been passed, whether the same can be looked into by this Court in exercise of power conferred under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. He, upon such query, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this application with a liberty to search out the alternative remedy available. In view thereof, such leave is being granted. Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Saurabh (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 11(6).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.