The High Court
Case Details
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.452 of 2024 ---- 1. Tuntun Kumar 2. Amar Kumar Yadav 3. Md. Aslam Perwez 4. Md. Sajid Ali Akhtar 5. Md. Alamgir 6. Kunal Kumar 7. Anuj Kumar 8. Sulochna Kumari -Versus- …. …. Petitioners 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa. P.S. Jagganathpur, Ranchi 3. The Director, Primary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Chatra 5. The Deputy Commissioner, Koderma 6. The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad 7. The Deputy Commissioner, Pakur 8. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar 9. The Deputy Commissioner, Giridih 10. The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro 11. The Deputy Commissioner, Godda 12. The Deputy Commissioner, Dumka 13. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh 14. The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh 15. The Deputy Commissioner, Sahebganj 16. The Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara 17. The Deputy Commissioner, Garhwa 18. The Deputy Commissioner, Palamau 19. The Deputy Commissioner, Latehar …. …. Respondents With W.P.(S) No.509 of 2024 ---- 1. Endra Narayan Yadav 2. Binod Kumar Mandal 3. Md. Ahmad Raja 4. Ranjeet Kumar 5. Panchanan Yadav -Versus- …. …. Petitioners 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa. P.S. Jagganathpur, Ranchi 3. The Director, Primary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa P.S. Jagganathpur, Ranchi 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Chatra 5. The Deputy Commissioner, Koderma 6. The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad 7. The Deputy Commissioner, Pakur 8. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar 9. The Deputy Commissioner, Giridih 10. The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro 11. The Deputy Commissioner, Godda -2- 12. The Deputy Commissioner, Dumka 13. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh 14. The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh 15. The Deputy Commissioner, Sahebganj 16. The Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara With W.P.(S) No.514 of 2024 ---- …. …. Respondents 1. Vikash Chandra Pandey 2. Narayan Verma 3. Bhikari Singh 4. Surendra Kumar Roy 5. Prabhu Nath Sharma -Versus- …. …. Petitioners 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa. P.S. Jagganathpur, Ranchi 3. The Director, Primary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa P.S. Jagganathpur, Ranchi 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Chatra 5. The Deputy Commissioner, Koderma 6. The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad 7. The Deputy Commissioner, Pakur 8. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar 9. The Deputy Commissioner, Giridih 10. The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro 11. The Deputy Commissioner, Godda 12. The Deputy Commissioner, Dumka 13. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh 14. The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh 15. The Deputy Commissioner, Sahebganj 16. The Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara With W.P.(S) No.522 of 2024 ---- …. …. Respondents 1. Om Prakash Sah 2. Tara Pad Sah 3. Birchandra Mandal 4. Jitendra Nath Mandal 5. Rajesh Kumar Sah 6. Jinnar Hussain 7. Bibek Das -Versus- …. …. Petitioners 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2. The Director, Primary Education (Directorate of Education), School Education and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Ranchi 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Ranchi 5. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, East Singhbhum 6. The District Superintendent of Education, East Singhbhum -3- 7. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Dhanbad 8. The District Superintendent of Education, Dhanbad 9. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Chatra 10. The District Superintendent of Education, Chatra 11. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Sahebganj 12. The District Superintendent of Education, Sahebganj 13. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Giridih 14. The District Superintendent of Education, Giridih 15. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Pakur 16. The District Superintendent of Education, Pakur 17. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Godda 18. The District Superintendent of Education, Godda 19. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Jamtara 20. The District Superintendent of Education, Jamtara 21. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Bokaro 22. The District Superintendent of Education, Bokaro 23. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Dumka 24. The District Superintendent of Education, Dumka 25. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Seraikella 26. The District Superintendent of Education, Seraikella 27. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Deoghar 28. The District Superintendent of Education, Deoghar …. …. Respondents With W.P.(S) No.599 of 2024 ---- 1. Lalmani Singh 2. Shashi Kishore 3. Sunil Yadav -Versus- …. …. Petitioners 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2. The Director, Primary Education (Directorate of Education), School Education and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Hazaribagh 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Hazaribagh 5. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Koderma 6. The District Superintendent of Education, Koderma 7. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Dhanbad 8. The District Superintendent of Education, Dhanbad 9. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Chatra 10. The District Superintendent of Education, Chatra -4- 11. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Sahebganj 12. The District Superintendent of Education, Sahebganj 13. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Giridih 14. The District Superintendent of Education, Giridih 15. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Pakur 16. The District Superintendent of Education, Pakur 17. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Godda 18. The District Superintendent of Education, Godda 19. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Jamtara 20. The District Superintendent of Education, Jamtara 21. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Bokaro 22. The District Superintendent of Education, Bokaro 23. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Dumka 24. The District Superintendent of Education, Dumka 25. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Deoghar 26. The District Superintendent of Education, Deoghar 27. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Ramgarh 28. The District Superintendent of Education, Ramgarh …. …. Respondents With W.P.(S) No.684 of 2024 ---- 1. Sunita Kumari 2. Shobha Kumari -Versus- …. …. Petitioners 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2. The Director, Primary Education (Directorate of Education), School Education and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Dhanbad 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Dhanbad 5. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Chatra 6. The District Superintendent of Education, Chatra 7. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Sahebganj 8. The District Superintendent of Education, Sahebganj 9. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Giridih 10. The District Superintendent of Education, Giridih 11. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Pakur 12. The District Superintendent of Education, Pakur 13. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Godda 14. The District Superintendent of Education, Godda -5- 15. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Jamtara 16. The District Superintendent of Education, Jamtara 17. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Bokaro 18. The District Superintendent of Education, Bokaro 19. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Dumka 20. The District Superintendent of Education, Dumka 21. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Deoghar 22. The District Superintendent of Education, Deoghar 23. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Hazaribagh 24. The District Superintendent of Education, Hazaribagh 25. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Koderma 26. The District Superintendent of Education, Koderma 27. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Ramgarh 28. The District Superintendent of Education, Ramgarh …. …. Respondents With W.P.(S) No.764 of 2024 ---- 1. Paras Kumar Sahu 2. Shambhu Nath Deoghariya -Versus- …. …. Petitioners 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Rajbhasa and Administrative Reforms, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Ranchi. 4. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 5. The Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 6. The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad 7. The District Superintendent of Education, Dhanbad 8. The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro 9. The District Superintendent Education, Bokaro 10. The Deputy Commissioner, Chatra 11. The District Superintendent Education, Chatra 12. The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh 13. The District Superintendent Education, Ramgarh 14. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh 15. The District Superintendent Education, Hazaribagh 16. The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi 17. The District Superintendent Education, Ranchi 18. The Deputy Commissioner, Khunti 19. The District Superintendent Education, Khunti 20. The Deputy Commissioner, Gumla 21. The District Superintendent Education, Gumla 22. The Deputy Commissioner, Gharwa 23. The District Superintendent Education, Gharwa 24. The Deputy Commissioner, Simdega 25. The District Superintendent Education, Simdega 26. The Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga -6- 27. The District Superintendent Education, Lohardaga 28. The Deputy Commissioner, Palamau 29. The District Superintendent Education, Palamau 30. The Deputy Commissioner, Latehar 31. The District Superintendent Education, Latehar With W.P.(S) No.775 of 2024 ---- …. …. Respondents 1. Jodhan Saw 2. Raju Yadav 3. Narayan Vishwakarma 4. Ashok Dhobi 5. Basant Kumar Rana 6. Dineshwar Yadav 7. Santosh Kumar 8. Premcand Thakur 9. Prabhash Kumar Bhagat 10. Chandan Kumar Tinku -Versus- …. …. Petitioners 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa. P.S. Jagganathpur, Ranchi 3. The Director, Primary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa P.S. Jagganathpur, Ranchi 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Chatra 5. The Deputy Commissioner, Koderma 6. The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad 7. The Deputy Commissioner, Pakur 8. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar 9. The Deputy Commissioner, Giridih 10. The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro 11. The Deputy Commissioner, Godda 12. The Deputy Commissioner, Dumka 13. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh 14. The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh 15. The Deputy Commissioner, Sahebganj 16. The Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara …. …. Respondents With W.P.(S) No.508 of 2024 ---- 1. Tajuddin Shaikh 2. Md. Sahir Hossain -Versus- …. …. Petitioners 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2. The Director, Primary Education (Directorate of Education), School Education and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Ranchi 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Ranchi 5. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, East Singhbhum 6. The District Superintendent of Education, East Singhbhum -7- 7. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Dhanbad 8. The District Superintendent of Education, Dhanbad 9. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Sahebganj 10. The District Superintendent of Education, Sahebganj 11. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Pakur 12. The District Superintendent of Education, Pakur 13. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Jamtara 14. The District Superintendent of Education, Jamtara 15. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Bokaro 16. The District Superintendent of Education, Bokaro 17. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Dumka 18. The District Superintendent of Education, Dumka 19. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Seraikella 20. The District Superintendent of Education, Seraikella …. …. Respondents With W.P.(S) No.665 of 2024 ---- 1. Kalyan Saha 2. Rajkishor Saha 3. Laxman Prasad Gupta 4. Sourabh Kumar -Versus- …. …. Petitioners 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2. The Director, Primary Education (Directorate of Education), School Education and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Hazaribagh 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Hazaribagh 5. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Koderma 6. The District Superintendent of Education, Koderma 7. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Dhanbad 8. The District Superintendent of Education, Dhanbad 9. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Chatra 10. The District Superintendent of Education, Chatra 11. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Sahebganj 12. The District Superintendent of Education, Sahebganj 13. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Giridih 14. The District Superintendent of Education, Giridih 15. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Pakur 16. The District Superintendent of Education, Pakur 17. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Godda -8- 18. The District Superintendent of Education, Godda 19. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Jamtara 20. The District Superintendent of Education, Jamtara 21. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Bokaro 22. The District Superintendent of Education, Bokaro 23. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Dumka 24. The District Superintendent of Education, Dumka 25. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Deoghar 26. The District Superintendent of Education, Deoghar 27. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Established Committee, Ramgarh 28. The District Superintendent of Education, Ramgarh …. …. Respondents With W.P.(S) No.755 of 2024 ---- 1. Subhash Chandra Das 2. Md. Shahabuddin 3. Sujit Kumar 4. Uttam Kumar Kishore 5. Prawez Alam 6. Mahabir Prasad Yadav 7. Binod Prasad Yadav 8. Narsingh Poddar 9. Md. Paigam Ansari -Versus- …. …. Petitioners 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa. P.S. Jagganathpur, Ranchi 3. The Director, Primary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa P.S. Jagganathpur, Ranchi 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Chatra 5. The Deputy Commissioner, Koderma 6. The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad 7. The Deputy Commissioner, Pakur 8. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar 9. The Deputy Commissioner, Giridih 10. The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro 11. The Deputy Commissioner, Godda 12. The Deputy Commissioner, Dumka 13. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh 14. The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh 15. The Deputy Commissioner, Sahebganj 16. The Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara With W.P.(S) No.785 of 2024 ---- 1. Zeyaul Hasan 2. Abdus Salam 3. Soumitra Kumar Pal 4. Utpal Chandra …. …. Respondents -9- 5. Subrata Kumar Shaw 6. Ajay Kumar Namta 7. Naba Kishor Mahato 8. Subhash Chandra Mahato 9. Shoubhik Kumar Mahato -Versus- …. …. Petitioners 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa. P.S. Jagganathpur, Ranchi 3. The Director, Primary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa P.S. Jagganathpur, Ranchi 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi 5. The Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum 6. The Deputy Commissioner, Saraikela 7. The Deputy Commissioner, Dumka 8. The Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara 9. The Deputy Commissioner, Sahebganj 10. The Deputy Commissioner, Pakur 11. The Deputy Commissioner, Godda 12. The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro 13. The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad 14. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar With W.P.(S) No.733 of 2024 ---- …. …. Respondents 1. Rajesh Kumar 2. Mukesh Kumar Mandal 3. Manoj Kumar 4. Manoranjan Samant 5. Biman Kumar Sahani 6. Kanak Kumar Singh 7. Ashish Kumar Gupta 8. Prakash Panjiyara 9. Binod Panjiyara 10. Rajeev Ranjan -Versus- …. …. Petitioners 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building P.O & P.S. Dhurwa, Ranchi 2. The Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Director, Primary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa Ranchi 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Chatra 5. The District Superintendent of Education, Hazaribagh 6. The District Superintendent of Education, Ramgarh 7. The District Superintendent of Education, Koderma 8. The District Superintendent of Education, Giridih 9. The District Superintendent of Education, Bokaro 10. The District Superintendent of Education, Dhanbad 11. The District Superintendent of Education, Dumka 12. The District Superintendent of Education, Deoghar 13. The District Superintendent of Education, Jamtara 14. The District Superintendent of Education, Godda 15. The District Superintendent of Education, Sahibganj 16. The District Superintendent of Education, Pakur -10 - 17. The District Superintendent of Education, Ranchi 18. The District Superintendent of Education, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur 19. The District Superintendent of Education, Saraikela-Kharsawan …. …. Respondents
Legal Reasoning
---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioners : M/s, Sarita Gupta, Abhijeet Kumar, Baleshwar Yadav, Shubham Mishra, Tapan Kumar Mishra, Rajesh Bhushan, Kumar Pawan, Advocates For the State : M/s. Rakesh Kumar Shahi, Vishnu Prabhakar Pathak (A.C to S.C.V), Ranjan Kumar (A.C to Sr. S.C.I), Shilipi (A.C to S.C. (Mines-II), Divyam (A.C Toppo,(G.A.V), Krishna Kumar Bhatt (A.C to S.C.I) Jayant Franklin to S.C.IV), 03/Dated: 20th February, 2024 ---- 1. 2. 3. Defects, as pointed out by the office, are ignored. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. The order dated 05.02.2024 passed in W.P.(S) No. 189 of 2024 along with analogus cases read as under: “1. Heard the parties. 2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the issues involved in the present writ petition has already been considered and decided vide order dated 15.09.2023 passed in L.P.A. No. 203 of 2022 and other analogous cases. It is a general direction in which the State is directed to act upon the entire matter of similar nature. 3. The direction issued by the L.P.A. Court in paragraph No. 57 reads as under: “57. This Court, on entirety of facts and circumstances, is of the view that the order passed by learned Single Judge needs no interference by this Court and the direction so passed by learned Single Judge needs no interference by this Court and is required to be complied with at an earliest as the vacancies is of the year 2015 and it must be put to logical end without snatching right of candidates, if they are otherwise eligible. Therefore, the appellants State are hereby directed to: I. Initiate the process of counseling forthwith for the present petitioners by way of last opportunity as it is alleged they have obtained more marks than the last selected candidates in the merit list in the respective districts. II. The petitioners shall approach the Deputy Commissioners of the concerned Districts, as early as possible, preferably, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. III. However, in the meantime, the Deputy Commissioner of the concerned district shall give proper notice to the petitioners by way of Press Communique, advertising the notice in the local newspaper having the wide circulation in the concerned Districts and also by putting the notice on the Notice Board of the Office of concerned District Superintendent of Education. IV. This Court hopes and trusts that the entire process of counseling will be completed within a period of further eight weeks subject to fulfilling the eligibility criteria and also if the present petitioners have secured more marks than the last selected candidates. V. It is made clear that the entire process of selection shall be made strictly in accordance with relevant rules/regulations and judicial pronouncements, as mentioned above, -11 - within a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order. VI. Let it be made clear that no further counselling shall be held for any reasons whatsoever as the advertisement for appointment of these teachers are of 2015 and the aforesaid directions have been issued in peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, which shall be not taken as precedent.” 4. It appears that it has been followed by the Co-ordinate Bench and about 100 orders have been passed giving similar benefits to one and others writ petitioners. Thus, now it is required that similar treatment should be extended to all the similarly situated candidates otherwise, it will be violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. 5. In view of the above discussions, the State is directed to file specific counter affidavit disclosing his intention and the direction taken by him. 6. It has been informed that the counselling is to be started by 10th of February, 2024. 7. Hence, put up this matter on 8th February, 2024 along with W.P.(S) No. 200 of 2024, W.P.(S) No. 206 of 2024, W.P.(S) No. 239 of 2024, W.P.(S) No. 366 of 2024, W.P.(S) No. 394 of 2024, W.P.(S) No. 450 of 2024, W.P.(S) No. 463 of 2024 and W.P.(S) No. 478 of 2024." 4.
Decision
Since the common issues are involved in the present cases, all the writ petitions are taken up together. 5. It appears that a selection process has been initiated in the year 2015-2016 for appointment on post of Assistant Teachers. The process of selection has been completed. In the meantime, some petitions have been filed in the Court stating that the persons with less marks have been appointed while the persons having higher marks have been left out. 6. These matters have been considered by the L.P.A. Court and final order dated 15.09.2023 has been passed in L.P.A. No. 203 of 2022 and other analogous cases by which order has been passed for re-counselling for those candidates, who have obtained more marks, but that prayer has been confined to the writ petitioners only. It appears that along with the said L.P.As there was a writ petition also and the same benefit was given to that writ petitioner also. 7. It further appears that thereafter several cases have been filed in this High Court and the benefit given by the L.P.A. Court has been extended to those candidates, who have approached the High Court. Latest order dated 31.01.2024 with direction has been passed in L.P.A. No. 510 of 2023 and analogous cases as contained in para-33 of the said order which is quoted herein below: “33. Since it was the specific case of the writ petitioners that they were never called for counseling and that candidates securing less marks than the writ 13 petitioners were called for counseling and were selected, it would be important to issue the following clarifications / directions in consonance with the specific stand of the various writ petitioners in the batch of cases involved in the impugned order though this Court is not inclined to differ with the findings and directions issued vide order dated 15.09.2023 passed in L.P.A. No. 203 of 2022:- (a) Only those candidates are to be called for counseling who have never been called for counseling earlier in one or the other district irrespective of the fact as to whether they had participated in the counseling or not. (b) To enable the candidate to participate in the fresh counseling the concerned respondent shall verify whether a candidate below in the merit list in the concerned district has been ultimately selected irrespective of the fact as to whether such a -12 - candidate had joined or not. If that be so, then only such candidate be permitted to appear in the fresh counseling. (c) There should be one counseling to be conducted simultaneously in all the districts as was directed by this Court in W.P. (S) No. 19 of 2016 and other analogous cases which has been upheld in L.P.A. No. 168 of 2017.” 8. Thus, it appears that earlier the Court has taken view that a person with the more marks has to be given an opportunity by one time counseling, but this was restricted to the writ petitioners only, but subsequently, vide order dated 31.01.2024 passed in L.P.A. No. 510 of 2023 and analogous cases, the same has been enlarged to all the candidates who are similarly situated. It is not a case of the State that they are not following the one and other orders passed by the Hon’ble Court. To maintain the consistency in the judicial proceeding, it is mandated to the respondents to give same benefits to the present writ petitioners also. 9. With the above observations and directions to the respondents, all the present writ petitions stands allowed. Raja/- Uploaded (Rajesh Kumar, J.)