Shankar Modak v. Dilip Modak
Case at a glance
- Bench
- CHIEF
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Ankit Vishal, Advocate. Mr. Abhishek Kr. Dubey, Advocate Mr. Yuvraj Singh, Advocate Mr. Amitabh Prasad, Advocate Heard counsel for the appellants.
Both the trial court as well as the First Appellate Court have held against the appellants/defendants and declared the title of the respondents/plaintiffs/predecessors of plaintiffs with regard to 1 and 1½ decimals of land, located in Plot No. 648 and Plot No. 649 in R.S. Khata No. 108.
I have carefully considered the judgment of the trial court and the First Appellate Court. The findings recorded by the said courts are based on proper appreciation of evidence and cannot be said to be perverse warranting interference by this Court in exercise of its restrictive jurisdiction under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Therefore, I do not find any merit in the Second Appeal. It is accordingly, dismissed.
There shall be no order as to costs. APK/RK (M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.