✦ High Court of India

Deoghar Mill Deoghar Rice Mill represented through its Managing Partner Dev Kumar Jha & v. Union of India through under Secretary to the Government of India & Others

Case Details

2025:JHHC:35437-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 370 of 2014 Deoghar Mill Deoghar Rice Mill represented through its Managing Partner Dev Kumar Jha & Anr. Versus Union of India through under Secretary to the Government of India & Others With C. Rev. No. 12 of 2015 Sidhi Vinayak Food Private Limited through its Director Rajesh Somani Versus ….. Appellants ….. Respondents ….. Petitioner Union of India through under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Consumer Affair & Others ….. Respondents With C. Rev. No. 13 of 2015 Hemkunt Rice Mills Private Limited through its Managing Director-cum-Authorized Signatory Versus ….. Petitioner Union of India through under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Consumer Affair & Others ….. Respondents With C. Rev. No. 14 of 2015 Bhagwati Vintrade Pvt. Limited through Authorized Signatory Namely Ravi Bhushan Singh ….. Petitioner Union of India through under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Consumer Affair & Others ….. Respondents Versus

Legal Reasoning

With C. Rev. No. 15 of 2015 Shri Ganesh Rice Mill through its Proprietor Namely Jai Prakash Agrawal Versus ….. Petitioner Union of India through under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Consumer Affair & Others ….. Respondents With C. Rev. No. 16 of 2015 Prateek Agro Experts Pvt. Limited through its Director Namely Pradeep Chitlangia Versus ….. Petitioner Union of India through under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Consumer Affair & Others ….. Respondents With C. Rev. No. 17 of 2015 Shiv Shambhu Agrotech Private Ltd. through its Director Balram Kumar Agarwal Versus ….. Petitioner Union of India through under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Consumer Affair & Others ….. Respondents 1 2025:JHHC:35437-DB With C. Rev. No. 18 of 2015 Sunrise Cereals Pvt. Ltd. through its Director Namely Binod Kumar Sekhsaria Versus ….. Petitioner Union of India through under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Consumer Affair & Others ….. Respondents With C. Rev. No. 19 of 2015 Shree Ganesh Rice Mill through its Proprietor Namely Binod Kumar Sekhsaria Versus ….. Petitioner Union of India through under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Consumer Affair & Others ….. Respondents With C. Rev. No. 20 of 2015 Aadhar Rice Mill Pvt. Ltd. through its Director Namely Rajnish Kumar Versus ….. Petitioner Union of India through under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Consumer Affair & Others ….. Respondents With C. Rev. No. 21 of 2015 Samriddhi Rice Mill Pvt. Ltd. through its Director Namely Rishu Chirania Versus ….. Petitioner Union of India through under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Consumer Affair & Others ….. Respondents With C. Rev. No. 22 of 2015 Choudhary Rice Mill through its Proprietor Rajkishore Choudhary Versus The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Food & Others With C. Rev. No. 23 of 2015 Shree Bhagwati Rice and Flour Mill through its Proprietor Pradip Kumar Khetan The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Food & Others Versus With C. Rev. No. 24 of 2015 Shri Bajrang Rice and Flour Mills through one of its partners Shri Pramod Kumar Agarwal The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Food & Others Versus 2 ….. Petitioner ….. Respondents ….. Petitioner ….. Respondents ….. Petitioner ….. Respondents 2025:JHHC:35437-DB With C. Rev. No. 25 of 2015 Chandrawati Rice Mills Pvt. Ltd. through its Managing Director Namely Rupesh Chandra Agrawal Versus ….. Petitioner Union of India through under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Consumer Affair & Others ….. Respondents With C. Rev. No. 26 of 2015 Kunj Bihari Food Processors Pvt. Ltd. through its Director Namely Anil Kumar Agrawal Versus ….. Petitioner Union of India through under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Consumer Affair & Others ….. Respondents With C. Rev. No. 27 of 2015 Rashmi Rice Mill through its Director Namely Ajay Kumar Singh Versus ….. Petitioner Union of India through under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Consumer Affair & Others ….. Respondents With C. Rev. No. 28 of 2015 Bajla Food Products Pvt. Ltd. through one of Its Directors Ramesh Kumar Bajla The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Food & Others Versus With C. Rev. No. 29 of 2015 Shiva Rice Mill through its Manager Shri Sushil Kumar Sureka The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Food & Others Versus With C. Rev. No. 30 of 2015 K S Industries through its proprietor Raj Kumar Singhania Versus The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Food & Others With C. Rev. No. 31 of 2015 Madan Rice and Oil Mills through its partner Vishal Mundra The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Food & Others Versus 3 ….. Petitioner ….. Respondents ….. Petitioner ….. Respondents ….. Petitioner ….. Respondents ….. Petitioner ….. Respondents 2025:JHHC:35437-DB With C. Rev. No. 32 of 2015 Shree Niranjan Rice Mill through its proprietor Bajrang Lal Bathwal The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Food & Others Versus With C. Rev. No. 33 of 2015 ….. Petitioner ….. Respondents P D R D Rice Mills Pvt. Ltd. through one of its Directors Rajkumar Singhania ….. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Food & Others With C. Rev. No. 34 of 2015 Deoghar Food Pvt. Ltd. through one of its Directors Pradeep Kumar Choudhary Versus The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Food & Others With C. Rev. No. 35 of 2015 Baidyanath Real Food Pvt. Ltd. through its Diretor Manish Sharma The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Food & Others Versus With C. Rev. No. 40 of 2015 Assay Ceramics and Chemical Pvt. Ltd. through its Director Namely Binod Kumar Agrawal Versus ….. Respondents ….. Petitioner ….. Respondents ….. Petitioner ….. Respondents ….. Petitioner Union of India through under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Consumer Affair & Others ….. Respondents ----- CORAM HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate Mr. Nillohit Choubey, Advocate Mr. Ashutosh Anand, AAG-III Mr. Mrinal Kanti Roy, Advocate Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondents: ----- 4 2025:JHHC:35437-DB 14/26.11.2025 Since learned counsel for the appellants/petitioners has no instruction to pursue these cases, the same are, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution at this stage. (TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, C.J.) (RAJESH SHANKAR, J) 26.11.2025 Satish/RKM Uploaded on 28.11.25 5

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments