✦ Himachal Pradesh High Court

Bhupinder & Anr. v. National Insurance Company Ltd. CMP No.24574 of 2025 a/w CMP(M) No.1798 & Ors.

CMP No. 24574 of 2025ANKIT

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

Application is allowed and disposed of

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Mr. Sarthak Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.1. CMP(M) No.1799 of 2025 The instant application has been filed for condoning the delay in filing the application for bringing on record the legal representatives of appellant No.3 namely Pawan Kumar, who died during the pendency of the appeal. Since appellants No.1 and 2, who are the parents of the deceased, are already on record and only the name of appellant No.3 is to be deleted from the array of parties, in the interest of justice, the delay in filing the application is condoned. Application is allowed and disposed of. CMP(M) No.1798 of 2025 The instant application has been filed under Order 22 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for bringing on record the legal heirs of appellant No.3. It has been averred in the application that appellant No.3 has died on 18.10.2021 when the appeal was pending adjudication before this Court. Since the deceased has left behind appellants No.1 and 2, who are his parents, the application is accordingly allowed and the name of appellant No.3 is deleted from the array of parties. Application stands disposed of. CMP No.24574 of 2025 The present application has been filed by the applicants/appellants for release of awarded amount in their favour. Notice. Mr. Sarthak Mehta, Advocate, appears and aceepts service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and prays for a week’s time to seek instructions in the matter. The appeal preferred by the applicants/appellants has partly been allowed on 08.04.2024. However, in the interest of justice, one week’s time is granted to respondent No.1 to seek instructions in the matter. List on 28.11.2025. November 21, 2025 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Application is allowed and disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 22 r. 3.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Himachal Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CMP No. 24574 of 2025). ← Search more judgments