NIC Ltd v. Rekha Devi Ors. CMPs No
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The applications stand disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Sambhav Bhasin and Ms. Shruti the non- Dubey, applicant/appellant. Advocates, Ms. Divya Rajta, Advocate, vice Mr. Ashok K. applicants/respondents No. 1 to 3. Advocate, Tyagi, Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 4 to 7. Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for respondent No. 9. The present applications, under Section 151 CPC, have been filed by applicants/respondents No. 1 to 3 for release of the award amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The applications are duly supported with the affidavits of all the applicants. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant has no objection in case the prayer made in the application allowed, as no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the applications, which are duly supported by the affidavits of all the applicants, coupled with the fact that till date, no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality, the same are allowed and the award amount, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of applicants/respondents No. 1 to 3, as per their respective shares, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to their bank accounts, details whereof have been mentioned in the applications. The applications stand disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 27th August, 2026 (raman)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The applications stand disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Himachal Pradesh High Court, on 27 Aug 2026. The bench was SUSHIL KUKREJA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.