Manoj Sharma v. State of H.P. CMP No. 19514 of 2025 in CWP No. 16462 & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- VIRENDER SINGH
Outcome
Allowed
In view of the above, the application is allowed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Operative part
Present: Mr. Saurav Rattan, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Varun Chandel, Mr. H.S. Rawat and Mohinder Zharaick, Additional Advocates General, for the respondents/State. By way of present application, indulgence of this Court has been sought to correct the description of the jail, in which applicant Manoj Sharma is confined. The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the relief of parole, has been allowed by this Court. However, according to the applicant, inadvertently, it had been mentioned in the writ petition that the applicant is lodged in Modern Central Jail, Kanda, District Shimla, H.P., whereas he has been transferred to Sub Jail, Kishanpura Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P. As such, a prayer has been made to correct the description of the jail, in which he has been lodged. In view of the above, the application is allowed and the description of the jail, which has been mentioned as “Modern Central Jail Kanda, District Shimla, H.P.’’, is ordered to be read as “Sub Jail, Kishanpura Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P.” Registry is directed to make the necessary correction in the order. Application is accordingly, disposed of. August 13, 2025 (Pramod) ( Virender Singh ) Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the application is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.