SHIMLA CWP No. 14 514 of 2026 · Himachal Pradesh High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Outcome
Disposed of
This petition is disposed of with the direction that after
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. This petition is disposed of with the direction that after the adjudication in Letters Patent Appeal by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court, which has been preferred by the State against judgment dated 07.04.2025, passed by the Hon'ble Coordinate Bench of this Court…
Judgment
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Surender K. Sharma, Advocate. : For the respondents Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Ms. Leena Guleria, DAG. (Oral) Notice. Ms. Leena Guleria, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
Operative part
This petition is disposed of with the direction that after the adjudication in Letters Patent Appeal by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court, which has been preferred by the State against judgment dated 07.04.2025, passed by the Hon'ble Coordinate Bench of this Court in Inder Singh Thakur and others Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, the representation of the petitioner, shall be decided by the Authority within 8 weeks as from the date of the adjudication of the Hon'ble Division Bench. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August (narender) 25 , 2026 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.