✦ Himachal Pradesh High Court · 27 Aug 2026

Bhupender Singh & Ors. v. Rakesh Kanwar & Anr.

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The petition is disposed of, so also the pending

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and, accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged.

Judgment

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 26.08.2026, wherein it has been stated that in compliance to the judgment dated

03.03.2026, passed in CWP No.2345 of 2026, the representation of the petitioners has been considered and decided by the Deputy Director of School Education Mandi, Shimla, Solan by way of passing detailed orders, vide office 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? orders dated 04.08.2026, 17.08.2026 & 26.08.2026, annexed 2 2026:HHC:36565 with the said communication.

#2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and, accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged.

#3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to assail office orders dated 04.08.2026, 17.08.2026 &

26.08.2026, in accordance with law, if they are still aggrieved. The petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. August 27, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi) ( Sushil Kukreja )

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is disposed of, so also the pending

Which court decided this case, and when?

Himachal Pradesh High Court, on 27 Aug 2026. The bench was SUSHIL KUKREJA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Himachal Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. SHIMLA COPC No. 1108 of 2026). ← Search more judgments