Nittu v. Isha Thakur
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The petition, so also pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. 24th August, 2026 (raman) ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge
Judgment
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : For the respondent : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate. Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Compliance affidavit has been filed in the open Court today, wherein, it has been stated that the judgment under reference has been implemented by the competent authority in its letter and spirit and necessary directions have been issued to the concerned field, vide letter dated
21.08.2026.
#2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the same is closed. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:35825 )
#3. However, the petitioner is at liberty to revive the present contempt petition, if occasion arises to do so.
#4. The petition, so also pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. 24th August, 2026 (raman) ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.