✦ Himachal Pradesh High Court · 24 Apr 2025

The Project Director, NHAI v. Ganga Prashad Sharma OMP(M) No & Anr.

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

for the applicant, the present application is allowed and

Judgment

Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate, for the appellant. Respondent No.1 ex parte. Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl. A.G., respondent No.2. OMP(M) No.340 of 2025 The instant application has been condonation of 2 days delay in filing the present appeal. As per the averments as made in the application, the impugned judgment was passed on 07.03.2025. The certified copy of the judgment was applied by the learned counsel for the applicant on 01.04.2025 and the same was delivered on 24.04.2025. It has been contended that while preparing the appeal certain documents were required and after obtaining the same, immediately, the appeal was prepared and, in this process, a delay of 2 days occurred, is neither intentional nor willful, but due unavoidable circumstances. Consequently, in view of the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit and in view of submissions as made by learned senior counsel for the applicant, the present application is allowed and delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. Arb. Appeal No._______ of 2026 Appeal be registered. Heard. Admit. Send for records. Issue post admission notice to respondent No.1, returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within three days. OMP No_______ of 2026 Be registered. Heard. Subject to deposit of entire awarded amount along with up-to-date interest by the appellant/applicant within a period of eight weeks from today, the operation, implementation and execution of impugned judgment dated 07.03.2025, as passed by learned District Judge, Mandi as well as arbitral award dated 07.08.2023 during the pendency of appeal is ordered to be stayed. Application stands disposed of. ( Romesh Verma ) Judge August 12, 2026 (vt)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: for the applicant, the present application is allowed and

Which court decided this case, and when?

Himachal Pradesh High Court, on 24 Apr 2025. The bench was ROMESH VERMA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Himachal Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. OMP(M) No. 340 of 2025). ← Search more judgments