Kamal Joshi & Ors. v. Rakesh Kanwar & Anr.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. However, in case the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to them, under the law. The petition, so also pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. 27th August, 2026 (raman) ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge
Judgment
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate. Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional For the respondents : Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 26.08.2026, wherein, it has been stated that arrears bills of the petitioners have been submitted in the concerned treasuries of the Districts.
#2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the same is closed. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:36564 )
#3. However, in case the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to them, under the law. The petition, so also pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. 27th August, 2026 (raman) ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.