Sant Ram & Ors. v. H.P. Road Transport Corporation
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 08 Mar 2011
- Bench
- V K SHARMA
Outcome
Disposed of
The petition is disposed of with a direction to the
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of, so also pending CMP(s), if any. Copy dasti. 8th March, 2011 (virender) (V.K. Sharma) Judge
Judgment
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, J.
1 Whether approved for reporting? No. ________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate (except petitioners No. 1, 2, 4, 10, 12, 16, 17, 21, 22 and 26 who are stated to have died) POA be filed during the course of the day. For the respondent: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. V.K. Sharma, J. (Oral). Heard.
Operative part
The petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to pay to the petitioners (deceased petitioners No. 1, 2, 4, 10, 12, 16, 17, 21, 22 and 26 through their legal heirs) the amount of due and admissible gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, if not already paid, along with interest @ 6% per annum, within three months from the date of production of copy of this judgment by the petitioner(s) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No . ...2... along with statement of claim(s) which shall be subject to verification from the records of the respondent-Corporation, failing which higher interest @ 9% per annum shall be payable.
In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of, so also pending CMP(s), if any. Copy dasti. 8th March, 2011 (virender) (V.K. Sharma) Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is disposed of with a direction to the
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Himachal Pradesh High Court, on 08 Mar 2011. The bench was V K SHARMA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.