State of H.P v. M/s Superflow Pvt. Ltd
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Mr. Advocate General. For the respondent: Nemo Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge The District Collector, Solan, H.P. on 07.10.2017, passed an order of vestment of land in question in the State of Himachal Pradesh on account of respondent’s failure in putting the land to use within the period prescribed under Section 118 of the Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972 (The Act in short). Respondent’s appeal against this order was allowed by the Divisional Commissioner, Shimla Division, on 06.03.2019. Revision 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972 — s. 118.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Himachal Pradesh High Court, on 21 Apr 2026. The bench was JYOTSNA REWAL DUA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.