Daulat Ram v. State of Himachal Pradesh
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Daulat Ram son of Late Shri Hari Ram, resident of Village Banjan, Post Office Mangoo, Tehsil Arki, District Solan, H.P. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh. ......Petitioner. ......Respondent. Application under Section-438 of Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure for granting anticipatory bail and further for quashing/recalling the non-bailable warrants issued against the petitioner and the proclamation issued for 30.11.2011. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr. R.S.Chandel, Advocate. Mr. J.S.Rana, Assistant Advocate General. Kuldip Singh , Judge( Oral). The learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that petitioner will approach the Court below in view of peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. The prayer has been made for withdrawing the petition with liberty to approach the Court below. The petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to approach the Court below as prayed. December 29,2011. (Krt) ( Kuldip Singh ), Judge. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment ?
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Himachal Pradesh High Court, on 29 Dec 2011.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.