✦ Himachal Pradesh High Court · 02 Nov 2012

M/s Indian Tecnomac Company Limited, Village Jagatpur, P.O.Misrwala, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District v. Babar Khan

PRADESH SHIMLA REV. PETITION No. 196 of 2012DEEPAK GUPTA, SANJAY KAROL

Case at a glance

Decided: 02 Nov 2012
Bench: DEEPAK GUPTA, SANJAY KAROL

Provisions considered

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 114

Read the judgment Find similar cases

Judgment

8. 9.

10.

11.

Babar Khan S/o Sh. Hanif Mohd. R/o Village Melion, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmour, H.P. Naranjan Singh S/o Sh. Karta Ram, R/o Village Melion, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmour, H.P. Shdeque Mohd. S/o Sh. Dalmeer Khan, R/o Village Melion, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. Balbir S/o Sh. Shabodeen, R/o Village Melion, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, District Sirmour, H.P. Sher Mohd. S/o Sh. Rehmat Ali, R/o Village Melion, Tehsil Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. (cid:133) Respondents. State of Himachal Pradesh through Principal Secretary (Home) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh. The Principal Secretary, Department of Industries, Shimla, H.P. The Director, Director of Industries, Bemloi, Shimla, H.P. The H.P. State Environment Proection and Pollution Control Board, Shimla, H.P. The mining Officer Nahan, District Sirmour, H.P. The District Commissioner cum Collector Nahan, District Sirmour, H.P. (cid:133) Proforma respondents. Review Petition under Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 of the CPC. Coram:

The Hon(cid:146)ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. The Hon(cid:146)ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. Whether approved for Reporting? No. For the petitioner: Mr. Amrinder Singh Rana, Advocate For the respondents-State: Mr.Vivek Singh Thakur, Addl. A.G. 2 Per Deepak Gupta, J.(Oral) There is no error apparent on the face of the record. The review petition is, therefore, dismissed. No costs. ( Deepak Gupta ) Judge. 2nd November, 2012. (cid:153) ( Sanjay Karol ) Judge.

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 114.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Himachal Pradesh High Court, on 02 Nov 2012. The bench was DEEPAK GUPTA, SANJAY KAROL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Himachal Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. PRADESH SHIMLA REV. PETITION No. 196 of 2012). ← Search more judgments

Judgment

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Which court decided this case, and when?

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

More cases under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Continue researching