✦ Himachal Pradesh High Court · 19 Nov 2010

Pal Singh Verma v. State of H.P & Ors.

CWP No. 4371 of 2010V K SHARMA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. November 19, 2010. (hl) (Justice V.K. Sharma), Judge.

Judgment

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Advocate. Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, For the respondents : General, Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate Verma, J.K. General for respondents No. 1 to 3. with Mr. Deputy Advocate Mr. M.A. Khan, Central Government Counsel for respondent No. 4. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (oral): The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:

a) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ a Mandamus directing the respondent State to step up the pay of the petitioner i.e. to Pay Band 5 (Rs. 37400-67000 and Grade Pay of Rs. 8600) w.e.f. 1.1.2006 to bring the same at par with the pay being drawn by Indian Police Service Service officers (Sh K.K. Indoria and Sh. Himanshu Mishra) who are junior to the petitioner and have been promoted to Indian Police Pradesh Police Service after the petitioner and to pay to the petitioner arrears of salary w.e.f. 1.1.2006 with interest @ 9 percent from 1.1.2006 till the date of actual payment.

2

2.

According to the petitioner, in view of the decision of the Apex Court in Union of India versus T.M. Somarajan and others reported in (2010) 1 SCC 129, he is entitled to succeed. It is seen that Annexure P6, representation, is pending.

3.

Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that the State Government has taken up the matter with the Central Government for proper clarification. There will be a direction to the 4th respondent to furnish required clarification in the light of the decision referred to above within one month from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. Thereafter the first respondent shall take action in the matter within another one month.

Operative part

4.

The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. November 19, 2010. (hl) (Justice V.K. Sharma), Judge.

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending

Which court decided this case, and when?

Himachal Pradesh High Court, on 19 Nov 2010. The bench was V K SHARMA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Himachal Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CWP No. 4371 of 2010). ← Search more judgments