Sarita Devi v. State of Himachal Pradesh
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 08 Jun 2012
Provisions considered
Judgment
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy A.G. ________________________________________________________________ Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral) Record perused. The order dated 6.6.2012 is made absolute. However, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation as and when called by the Investigation Officer by written Hukumnama. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not be examined after the sunset and before the sunrise and if the need be, she shall be examined at her home. It is also made clear that she shall be examined by the lady police official. Consequently, the present Cr.M.P.(M) stands disposed of. June 8, 2012 (Kalpana) (Justice Rajiv Sharma),
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.