Surinder Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.
Judgment
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: None. For the Respondents: Mr. Balram Sharma, DSGI, respondent No.1. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Mr. Advocate General, No.2. Additional respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Following order was passed in the matter on
22.07.2026:- “Matter has been called repeatedly. There is no appearance for the petitioner. In the interest of justice, list during next week.” Today also, the matter had been called many times, however, there is no appearance for the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed in default. 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand dismissed. July 30, 2026 Mukesh Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.