✦ Himachal Pradesh High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending

Provisions considered

Judgment

Statements of the parties have been recorded separately. The petitioner husband Shri Bhagat Singh had filed a petition for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, which was allowed by the District Judge(F), Shimla in terms of judgment and decree dated 29.7.2008 in HMA No.12-S/3 of 2006/05 titled as Bhagat Singh vs. Meena Devi. The appellant wife Smt. Meena Devi in the present appeal assailed the said judgment and decree. In terms of the joint petition filed under Section 13-B(1) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the parties are seeking dissolution of marriage by mutual consent. They have settled their issue with regard to alimony, maintenance, inheritance etc. The marriage undoubtedly has broken down irretrievably, as the parties have been residing separately for the last 18 years and have not cohabited since then. The elder daughter, born out of the wedlock is married and the other one is happily living with the mother. It is in the interest of the parties that the petition be disposed of and the marriage be dissolved as prayed. Accordingly, the petition filed by the appellant wife is substituted with the present joint petition filed under Section 13-B(1) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The statutory period is condoned. Accordingly, the decree is modified to the extent that the marriage of the parties stands dissolved by a decree of mutual consent as provided under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications. It shall always be open for the appellant to approach the Court seeking implementation of the terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. Judge. ( Sanjay Karol ), December 17, 2008 (rana)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — s. 13.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Himachal Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. FAO NO.491/2008 CMP No. 1059 of 2008). ← Search more judgments