Shri R.C. Katna v. Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board, Kumar House, Shimla-4
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 30 Oct 2012
- Bench
- V K SHARMA
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Shri R.C. Katna son of late Shri Basant Ram, Surya Cottage, New Flowerdale, Chhota Shimla, District Shimla (H.P.) (since dead) ..Petitioner. Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board, Kumar House, Shimla-4, through its Secretary. ..Respondent. Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. _______________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, J. 1 Whether approved for reporting? No. _______________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: (since dead) Mr. Dilip Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Anil God, Advocate vice Mr. Trilok Jamwal, Advocate. V.K. Sharma, J. (oral) Mr. Dilip Sharma, learned Senior Advocate, on instructions imparted by Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, who was representing the petitioner, states at the bar that the petitioner has since died and as such the controversy raised in the present writ petition does not survive for adjudication. The petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous. October 30th, 2012 (virender) (V.K. Sharma) Judge 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Himachal Pradesh High Court, on 30 Oct 2012. The bench was V K SHARMA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.