Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
the application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as
Provisions considered
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ss. 14, 15
Judgment
Present: Mr. R.L. Sood, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Arjun Lall, Advocate, for the petitioner/non-applicant. Mr. M.A. Khan, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Hemkanta Kaushal, Advocate, for the respondent/ applicant. OMP No. 449 of 2018 Mr. M.A. Khan, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent-applicant, is permitted to withdraw this application under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with liberty to file a fresh application under Section 11 (6) of the Act. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. (V. Ramasubramanian) Chief Justice August 23, 2019 ( rajni )
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — ss. 14, 15.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.