Shyam Lal v. The State of Himachal Pradesh through Secretary (Rural
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition is disposed of, so also the
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
The State of Himachal Pradesh through Secretary (Rural Development and Panchayati Raj) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh Shimla. State of Himachal Pradesh through Secretary (Revenue) to The Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, H.P.
S.D.O (Rural) Chopal, Tehsil Chopal, District Shimla, H.P. _________________________________________________________________ (cid:133).Respondents. Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Coram:
The Hon(cid:146)ble Mr. Justice V.K.Sharma J. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner : Mr. Naresh Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents Mr. P.K. Sharma, Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Advocate General. Assistant ____________________________________________________________ V.K. Sharma, J (Oral). The petition has been filed with the following prayer: (cid:147)That the respondent authorities may kindly be directed to make necessary entries in the revenue record and issued the OBC certificate in favour of the petitioner(cid:148). __________________________________________________________________ Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment. ? 2
2. According to the petitioner, the issue involved in the present writ petition is covered in his favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 7542 of 2010, titled as Shyam Lal versus State of H.P. and others, decided on 6.12.2010. If that be so, similar treatment shall also be extended to the petitioner in the above referred decision, in case the petitioner is also similarly situated, within a period of three days from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the competent authority i.e. Sub Divisional Officer (Rural), Chopal.
Operative part
3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any, No costs. Copy dasti on usual terms. February 10, 2012 (PST) (V.K. Sharma) Vacation Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is disposed of, so also the
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.