✦ Himachal Pradesh High Court · 02 Aug 2016

Judgment · High Court · 2016

CO.PET No. 3 of 1977RAJIV SHARMA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

Accordingly, the application is allowed

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Advocate for the Official Liquidator. Co. Application No. 47 of 2016 M/s Hypine Carbons Limited was ordered to be wounded up by this Court vide order dated 16.5.1978. Thereafter, secured creditors disposed of assets/property of the company in liquidation in terms of order of this Court on 16.12.1991. Misfeasance application (C.A. No.6/83) was dismissed by this Court on 13.11.1998. Thereafter, application (C.A. No.21/2004) was moved by the Official Liquidator seeking direction to the secured creditors for providing funds for claim of workers. It was also dismissed by this Court on 17.5.2005. Now, as per the record of the official liquidator, the company in liquidation has no property/assets for disposal. As per the averments made in the application, an amount of Rs.40,000/- (approx.) is lying available in the company for utilization of legal fee and other liquidation expenses. The court has gone through the pleadings and the documents placed on record. Accordingly, the application is allowed. The company is ordered to be dissolved under section 481 of the Companies Act 1956. The official liquidator is directed to 2 publish a consolidated dissolution notice in the local newspaper. Thereafter the official liquidator shall be discharged as the liquidator of the company. The application stands disposed.

2.8.2016 *pankaj* (Rajiv Sharma) Judge

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the application is allowed

Which court decided this case, and when?

Himachal Pradesh High Court, on 02 Aug 2016. The bench was RAJIV SHARMA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Himachal Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CO.PET No. 3 of 1977). ← Search more judgments