V.Naveen Kumar v. State of Tamilnadu
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
CRL OP(MD) NO. 22125 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRICRL OP(MD) NO. 22125 of 2025V.Naveen KumarPetitionerVs1. State of Tamilnadu Rep By The Superintendent of Police, Theni District2. The Inspector of PoliceBodinayakkanur Town Police StationTheni District.3. The Inspector of PoliceDistrict Crime BranchTheni District.4. Gopinath5.Sathish Kumar6. SathyapriyanRespondent(s) For Petitioner: Mr. M.Jerin MathewFor Respondent 1 to 3: Mr.M.Sakthi KumarGovernment Advocate(Criminal Side)Prayer:C-41D. To direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd and 4th respondent not to harass the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis petitioner illegally based upon a false complaint lodged by 5th respondent and also to take appropriate action on the representation made by the petitionerORDERToday the matter came up for hearing under the caption “for being mentioned”.
Paragraph No. 6 (a) has to be altered as follows:
(a) If any complaint is received against the petitioner, the respondent-police shall issue written summons/notice under Section 62 Cr.P.C., 1973 / 64 BNSS, 2023, specifying the date, time, and purpose of enquiry. Oral or informal summons are prohibited.
Registry is directed to carry out the necessary corrections and issue fresh order copy.25-02-2026Sml
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.