Judgment · High Court · 2025
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
This writ petition stands disposed of accordingly
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
1 W.P.(MD)NO.32682 OF 2025BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 20.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN ANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHIW.P.(MD)No.32682 of 2025 ANDW.M.P.(MD)No.25768 of 2025 Vetrivel ... PetitionerVs.
The District Collector / Monitoring Committee, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District.
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kuppakudi Division, Allangudi Taluk, Pudukottai District.
The Tahsildar, Paathampatti Village, Kuppakudi Division, Allangudi Taluk, Pudukottai District.
The Block Development Officer, Paathampatti Village, Kuppakudi Division, Allangudi Taluk, Pudukottai District.
Ganesan6. Murugaiah1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2 W.P.(MD)NO.32682 OF 20257. Rajendran8. Mathiyalagan9. Panayappan ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to remove the encroachments made by the respondents 5 to 9 in the Government poramboke water body situated in survey Nos.77 and 72 Paathampatti Village, Kuppakudi Division, Allangudi Taluk, Pudukottai District and restore the said water body to its original condition thereby, considering the representations made by the petitioner on 11.11.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.D.R.MurugesanFor Respondents : Mr.M.Gangatharan, Government Advocate for R-1 to R-3. Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar, Special Government Pleader for R-4. * * *
Operative part
O R D E RHeard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the fourth respondent. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3 W.P.(MD)NO.32682 OF 20252. Issuance of notice to the respondents 5 to 9 is dispensed with. 3. The relief is sought in respect of survey Nos.72 and 77 of Paathampatti Village. The learned Government Advocate states that survey No.72 has been classified as patta land. No relief is granted in respect of the said survey number. Survey No.77 appears to be a water body. 4. The third respondent is directed to issue notice to the private respondents and other encroachers if any, conduct survey and if the encroachments are noticed, then by adhering to due process of law, the encroachments shall be removed. The entire exercise will be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) & (B.PUGALENDHI, J.) 20th November 2025 NCC : Yes / NoIndex : Yes / NoInternet : Yes / NoPMU3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4 W.P.(MD)NO.32682 OF 2025To:1. The District Collector / Monitoring Committee, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kuppakudi Division, Allangudi Taluk, Pudukottai District. 3. The Tahsildar, Paathampatti Village, Kuppakudi Division, Allangudi Taluk, Pudukottai District. 4. The Block Development Officer, Paathampatti Village, Kuppakudi Division, Allangudi Taluk, Pudukottai District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5 W.P.(MD)NO.32682 OF 2025G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ANDB.PUGALENDHI, J.PMUW.P.(MD)No.32682 of 202520.11.20255/5
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This writ petition stands disposed of accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Madras High Court, on 20 Nov 2025. The bench was G R SWAMINATHAN, B PUGALENDHI, ANDB PUGALENDHI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.