Lakshmanan v. The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 2525. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. NoCosts. Sd/-Assistant Registrar(CO)/True copy/Sub Assistant Registrar To1.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.+1CC TO MR.P.ATHIMOOLAPANDIAN, ADVOCATE SR.24241PmSR : 02.08.2011 : 2p/4cW.P.(MD)No.8187 of 201122.07.2011
Judgment
1BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED:22.07.2011CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKARW.P(MD)No.8187 of 2011 Lakshmanan .. PetitionerVs.
The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District. .. RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pass necessary order in dispose of the appeal dated nil filed by the petitioner within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.P.AthimoolapandianFor Respondents : Mr.M.Govindan Additional Govt. PleaderO R D E RThis Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner, within a stipulated time. 2. Heard Mr.P.Athimoolapandian, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents.
By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final hearing.
Considering the limited scope of the relief sought for in this petition, without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner, if it has not been disposed of earlier, after hearing the parties concerned to avoid allegations of violation of principles of natural justice. The appeal shall be disposed of on its own merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within aperiod of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's claim. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Operative part
With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. NoCosts. Sd/-Assistant Registrar(CO)/True copy/Sub Assistant Registrar To1.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.+1CC TO MR.P.ATHIMOOLAPANDIAN, ADVOCATE SR.24241PmSR : 02.08.2011 : 2p/4cW.P.(MD)No.8187 of 201122.07.2011
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.