Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- R SUDHAKAR
Outcome
Withdrawn
In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel for thepetitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
1BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 29.07.2011CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKARW.P(MD)No.6445 of 2011M/s Aruna Industrial Services, Godown 3/3, Melur Road, Ulaganeri Village, Madurai. .. Petitioner-Vs-.
The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, presently designated as The Commercial Tax Officer, (Enf.)(R.S.), Karur, Commercial Tax Office, Karur.
The Assistant Commissioner(CT), Tallakulam Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Building, Dr.Thangaraj Salai, Madurai. PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to give effect to the revision order in R.P.No.31/2004, dated 25.08.2005 bypassing revised order and further direct to refund the amount of taxes paid in excess along with interest due thereon as contemplated under Section 24(4) read with Rule 23-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales TaxRules, 1959 through the second respondent. For Petitioner :Mr.R.D.GanesanFor Respondents :Mr.TR.Janathanam Additional Government Pleader.
Operative part
O R D E RThe learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Courtto withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Sd/-Assistant Registrar (AS)/True copy/Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2To1. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, presently designated as The Commercial Tax Officer, (Enf.)(R.S.), Karur, Commercial Tax Office, Karur.2. The Assistant Commissioner(CT), Tallakulam Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Building, Dr.Thangaraj Salai, Madurai. +1CC TO THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.25558SslSR : 09.08.2011 : 2p/4cW.P(MD)No.6445 of 201129.07.2011
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel for thepetitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.