Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- M M SUNDRESH
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 2323. Even though notices sent have been served on the respondents and their names appeared in the cause list, none appears for them. 4. Considering the limited scope of the writ petition coupled with the fact that the representations of the petitioner dated01.04.2011 and 31.05.2011…
Judgment
1BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 13.07.2011CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.P.S.JANARTHANA RAJAandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESHWrit Petition(MD)No.6062 of 2011K.Kannan..Petitioner Vs.
The President, Vickramasingapuram III Grade Municipality, Vickramasingapuram, Ambasamudram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.
The Executive Officer, Vickramasingapuram III Grade Municipality, Vickramasingapuram, Ambasamudram Taluk, Tirunelveli District. .. RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a direction against 1st and 2nd respondents to stop the wastages putting down in front of the Public Library and Primary Health Care Centre respectively, based upon the petitioner'swritten representations made on 01.04.2011 and 31.05.2011 by way of awrit of mandamus. For Petitioner: Mr.K.Kannan, Party in PersonO R D E R(Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)The writ petition is filed to direct the first and second respondents to stop the wastages put down in front of the PublicLibrary and Primary Health Care Centre respectively, based upon thepetitioner's written representations made on 01.04.2011 and31.05.2011.2.It is the grievance of the petitioner that certain third parties are causing health hazard by littering before the PublicLibrary and Primary Health Care Centre situated nearby therespondent-Municipality. Therefore, representations have been made on01.04.2011 and 31.05.2011 to the respondents 1 and 2 requesting them to take appropriate action. Since no action has been taken by the respondents, the petitioner has come forward to file the present writ petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Even though notices sent have been served on the respondents and their names appeared in the cause list, none appears for them. 4. Considering the limited scope of the writ petition coupled with the fact that the representations of the petitioner dated01.04.2011 and 31.05.2011 are yet to be disposed of, a direction is issued to the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the said representations and dispose of the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. Consequently, M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 is closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (P&A)/True Copy/Sub Assistant Registrar To1.The President, Vickramasingapuram III Grade Municipality, Vickramasingapuram, Ambasamudram Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 2. The Executive Officer, Vickramasingapuram III Grade Municipality, Vickramasingapuram, Ambasamudram Taluk, Tirunelveli District. +1cc to Mr.M.Karthikeya Venkatachalapathy, Advocate Sr.No.27939kmssk/25.07.2011 /4c-2p/- W.P.(MD)No.6062 of 2011 13.07.2011
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.