Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- K SUGUNA
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. The Commissioner, Kottampatti Union, Kottampatti, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. .. RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.12.2010 in accordance with law…
Judgment
1BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDated :: 29..03..2011Coram::THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE K. SUGUNAandTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.ARUMUGHASWAMYWrit Petition (MD)No.3681 of 2011and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011M. Kathiresan,S/o. Muthaiya Ambalam, Boothamangalam Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. .. Petitioner - Vs -1. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai - 625 020.
The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District.
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai District.
The Thasildar, Melur Taluk, Melur.
The Commissioner, Kottampatti Union, Kottampatti, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. .. RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.12.2010 in accordance with law within the time fixed by this Hon'ble Court pertaining to remove the encroachments in the common pathway in (Old Survey No.327/14A) NewSurvey No.539/32 in Boothamangalam Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. For Petitioner :: Mr.S.A.AjmalkhanFor Respondents :: Mr.R.Janakiramulu Special Government PleaderORDER(Order of the Court was delivered by K. SUGUNA, J.) The petitioner has filed this writ petition for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider his representation dated18.12.2010 in accordance with law within the time fixed by this Hon'bleCourt with regard to removal of encroachments in the common pathway in (OldSurvey No.327/14A) New Survey No.539/32 in Boothamangalam Village, MelurTaluk, Madurai District. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2. In view of the limited relief that has been sought for, this writ petition itself is disposed of with a direction to the fourth respondent /The Thasildar, Melur Taluk to consider and pass suitable orders on thepetitioner's representation dated 18.12.2010 in accordance with law, following the procedure contemplated under the relevant rules and after affording reasonable opportunity to all the parties concerned, within aperiod of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, there will be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 is closed. Sd/-Assistant Registrar(Crl. Side)/TRUE COPY/Sub Assistant RegistrarTo:1. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai - 625 020. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai District. 4. The Thasildar, Melur Taluk, Melur. 5. The Commissioner, Kottampatti Union, Kottampatti, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. +1cc to The Special Govt. Pleader SR.No.11962+1cc to Mr.S.A.Ajmal Khan, Advocate SR.No.12162W.P.(MD)No.3681 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 201129.03.2011DpnPA/21.04.2011/2P/8C
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.