M.P.Ram Mohan Raja v. The State of Tamil Nadu
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
2The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Since the application of the petitioner is pending with the second respondent, who is the competent authority, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the second respondent is directed to consider the application of the petitioner dated 8.9.2010 seeking quarrying lease…
Judgment
1BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED : 27-3-2012CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMARWrit Petition (MD) No.14089 of 2011M.P.Ram Mohan Raja ... PetitionerVs.
The State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by its Secretary, Industries Department, Fort St.George, Chennai.
The District Collector, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. ... RespondentsPrayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitutionof India, praying this Court to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to dispose of petitioner's application dated 8.9.2010requesting for grant of quarrying lease in S.No.38/1A and S.No.38/1Bsituated in Narikudi Village, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tirunelveli Districtin accordance with law within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner: Mr.J.KarthickFor Respondents : Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, Additional Government PleaderO R D E RThe prayer in the writ petition is to issue a writ of mandamusdirecting the respondents to dispose of petitioner's application dated8.9.2010 requesting for the grant of quarrying lease in S.No.38/1A andS.No.38/1B situated in Narikudi Village, Sankarankovil Taluk, TirunelveliDistrict, in accordance with law within a time frame fixed by this Court. 2. According to the petitioner, the said application was processed and due to the intervention of election to the Tamil Nadu LegislativeAssembly, the same was not considered and therefore petitioner filed this writ petition with the above prayer.
Operative part
Since the application of the petitioner is pending with the second respondent, who is the competent authority, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the second respondent is directed to consider the application of the petitioner dated 8.9.2010 seeking quarrying lease and pass necessary orders in accordance with law, withina period of three months. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. Nocosts. Sd/-Assistant Registrar/True Copy/Sub Assistant RegistrarTo1.The Secretary, Industries Department, Fort St.George, Chennai. 2. The District Collector, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.3.+1 CC to special Government Pleader, SR No.9665/12W.P.(MD)No.14089 of 201127-3-2012vrpsk/25.04.2012/2P/4C
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.