Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- V RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Outcome
Withdrawn
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 2222. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs. Sd/-Deputy Registrar (Writs)/ True Copy / Assistant Registrar To1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai…
Judgment
1BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 14.11.2011CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIANW.P(MD)NO.12906 of 2011andM.P(MD) Nos.1 & 2 of 2011A.Ammaponnu ... PetitionerVersus1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai – 7.
The Inspector of Police, Karuppayurani Police Station, Madurai – 20.
Nagupandi, Sub Inspector of Police, Karuppayurani Police Station, Madurai – 20.
S.Rama, Special Sub Inspector of Police, Karuppayurani Police Station, Madurai – 20.
Murugesan, Sub Inspector of Police, Karuppayurani Police Station, Madurai – 20.
Palchamy, Sub Inspector of Police, Oomatchikulam Police Station, Madurai – 14.... RespondentsPRAYER : Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to2 to take appropriate action against the accused based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 29.05.2011 in Crime No.320 of 2011 on the file of the second respondent and to file a final report in free and fair way before Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai. For Petitioner: Mr.A.JeyaramFor Respondents: Mr.R.Karthikeyan Additional Government Pleader
O R D E RThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Operative part
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs. Sd/-Deputy Registrar (Writs)/ True Copy / Assistant Registrar To1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai – 7.2. The Inspector of Police, Karuppayurani Police Station, Madurai – 20.3. Nagupandi, Sub Inspector of Police, Karuppayurani Police Station, Madurai – 20.4. S.Rama, Special Sub Inspector of Police, Karuppayurani Police Station, Madurai – 20.5. Murugesan, Sub Inspector of Police, Karuppayurani Police Station, Madurai – 20.6. Palchamy, Sub Inspector of Police, Oomatchikulam Police Station, Madurai – 14. SslSR : 29.11.2011 : 2p/7cW.P.(MD)NO.12906 of 201114.11.2011
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.