✦ Madras High Court

Thangapandian v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

CRL OP(MD). No.18203 of 2025BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )Date : 27.10.2025PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHYCRL OP(MD). No.18203 of 2025Thangapandian ... Petitioner/Accused VsThe State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By,The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Dindigul, Dindigul District.(Crime No.19 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Murugapandi Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSSPRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.19 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.18203 of 2025ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 05.10.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 79 @ 79, 75 of BNS and Section 4 of TNPHW Act, in Crime No.19 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had misbehaved with the defacto complainant and thereafter, he contacted the defacto complainant through mobile phone and harassed her. Hence, the complaint.3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that civil suit is pending between the petitioner and the defacto complainant, a false case has been given. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court and he is in judicial custody from 05.10.2025. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.18203 of 20254. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner and the investigation is still pending. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Mahila Judge, Dindigul, Dindigul District, and on further conditions that :- [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.18203 of 2025[b] the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS. (S S Y J) 27.10.2025msrm4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.18203 of 2025To1. The learned Additional Mahila Judge, Dindigul, Dindigul District.2. The Superintendent, District Prison, Dindigul.3. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Dindigul, Dindigul District.4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.18203 of 2025S.SRIMATHY,J. msrmORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.18203 of 2025Date :27.10.20256/6

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments