Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The Writ Petition is disposed of as above
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 2323. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The petitioner has made a representation on 20.01.2010 for payment of compensation consequent to Inam settlement proceedings. Since the said representation has not been considered so far, this writ petition has…
Judgment
1BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED:29.09.2011CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKARW.P.(MD)No.10731 of 2011 Noorjahan: Petitioner -Vs-1.The Commissioner of Police, Survey and Settlement cum Director's office, Survey House, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
The Assistant Settlement Officer, Thanjavur, Now functioning at the Office of the Commissioner of Survey and Settlement, Survey House, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
The District Collector, Karur District, Karur.:RespondentsPRAYER:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.01.2010 and facilitate the payment of compensation payable to writ petitioner in respect of Inam settlement proceedings of Alathur Village, Kulithalai Taluk, TrichyDistrict. For Petitioner: Mrs.J.Maria RoselineFor Respondent: Mr.M.GovindanSpecial Government PleaderORDERThis writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issuea Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.01.2010 and facilitate the payment of compensation payable to writ petitioner in respect of Inam settlement proceedings of Alathur Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Trichy District. 2. Heard Mrs.J.Maria Roseline, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleaderfor the respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Operative part
By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The petitioner has made a representation on 20.01.2010 for payment of compensation consequent to Inam settlement proceedings. Since the said representation has not been considered so far, this writ petition has been filed by the petitioner. 5. The learned Special Government Pleader, on instructions, states that the officers will consider the representation based on the records for which all reasonable steps have been taken tore dress the grievance of the petitioner. 6. In view of the above, the third respondent is directed to take up the case of the petitioner with regard to thepetitioner's claim and dispose the same on its own merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of acopy of this order. 7. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. No Costs. Sd/-Assistant Registrar (Records)/ TRUE COPY /Sub Assistant RegistrarTo:1.The Commissioner of Police, Survey and Settlement cum Director's office, Survey House, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.2.The Assistant Settlement Officer, Thanjavur, Now functioning at the Office of the Commissioner of Survey and Settlement, Survey House, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.3.The District Collector, Karur District, Karur.+1CC to Mr.Sri Balaji, Advocate. SR.No.34268.RP/12.10.2011/2P/5C.W.P.(MD)No.10731 of 2011.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Writ Petition is disposed of as above
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.