Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
In view of the same, this Habeas CorpusPetition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The Inspector of Police, Aruppukkottai Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District. : RespondentsPRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indiato issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2 toproduce the body of the detenu, the petitioner's minor…
Judgment
1BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 03.01.2012CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMARANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DEVADASSHABEAS CORPUS PETITION(MD).No.908 of 2011 Muralidharan : PetitionerVs.
The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District.
Operative part
The Inspector of Police, Aruppukkottai Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District. : RespondentsPRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indiato issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2 toproduce the body of the detenu, the petitioner's minor son namely VishnuDinesh, aged about 12 years before this Court and hand over the custody tothe petitioner. For Petitioner: Mr.Abdul Khadar For M/s.Eddy EmbbossFor Respondents: Mr.T.Mohan, Additional Public ProsecutorO R D E R[Order of the Court was made by N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR, J].The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw the Habeas Corpus Petition and he has also made anendorsement to that effect. In view of the same, this Habeas CorpusPetition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD ASST REGISTRAR(A.S) /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASST REGISTRAR NBTo1.The Addl Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District.
The Inspector of Police, Aruppukkottai Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District.SB:19/01/2012 1P 4C ORDER MADE INHABEAS CORPUS PETITION(MD).No.908 of 201103.01.2012
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the same, this Habeas CorpusPetition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.