S.Saravanan v. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.2.The Inspector of Police, Panagudi Police
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ARUNA JAGADEESAN
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
1BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 08.08.2011CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.P.S.JANARTHANA RAJAandTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESANHabeas Corpus Petition(MD)No.403 of 2011S.Saravanan .. Petitioner Vs.
The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
The Inspector of Police, Panagudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.
Amirtha Kani .. RespondentsPetition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India toissue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce the body or persons of the petitioner's wife by name Viji, female, aged 27years and son by name Prabhu Sankar, minor, aged 1 ½ years, the detenusin the present case, before this Court and consequently set them at liberty. For petitioner : Mr.R.AnandFor respondents : Mr.C.Ramesh, Addl. Public Prosecutor for R1 and R2ORDER(Order of the Court was made by ARUNA JAGADEESAN, J.)This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the first and second respondents produce his wife by name Viji, aged 27 years and son by name Prabhu Sankar, aged 1 ½ years, before this Court and set them at liberty. 2. The petitioner is the husband of the detenue-Viji. They have amale child by name Prabhu Sankar, aged 1 ½ years. The petitioner has filed this HCP on the ground that the detenu-Viji left the house along with the child and did not return home and that he did not get any good response from the second and third respondent-Police on his complaint dated 11.05.2011. 3. Today, the detenue-Viji along with the child-Prabhu Sankarappeared in person before us. When we enquired, the detenue-Viji stated that she left the house on her own accord since she was harassed by herhusband/the petitioner herein. She also stated that she is not under the illegal custody of any one and that now she is willing to go along withher husband. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
The detenue is a major and she has expressed her willingness togo along with the petitioner/her husband. Therefore, recording the statement of the detenue-Viji, the Habeas Corpus Petition is closed as nothing further remains to be considered. Sd/-Assistant Registrar(CO)/True Copy/Sub Assistant RegistrarTo1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.2. The Inspector of Police, Panagudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.KMSR : 19.08.2011 : 2p/4c HCP(MD)No.403 of 2011 08.08.2011
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.