M.Jeyaprakash ...Revision v. M.Pandia Arasu
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel for thepetitioner, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as not pressed
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure s. 357C
Judgment
Operative part
1BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED : 21.06.2012 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.ARUMUGHASWAMY Crl.R.C.(MD) No.202 of 2011M.Jeyaprakash ...Revision Petitioner/ComplainantVs.M.Pandia Arasu ...Respondent/AccusedPRAYER: Petition is filed under Sections 397 r/w 401 of the CriminalProcedure Code, to set aside the sentence imposed by the lower Court inS.T.C.No.3782 of 2010, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam against the respondent/accused and enhance the imprisonmentand grant fair compensation, twice the cheque amount under Section 357Cr.P.C.For petitioner : Mr.A.P.AthithanFor Respondent: Mr.N.Dilip KumarORDERThe learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitionerhas received a sum of Rs.2,25,000/-(Rupees Two Lakhs and Twenty FiveThousand Only) from the respondent and they settled the matter amicablyand hence, he prayed that this Criminal Revision Petition may bedismissed as not pressed and he has also made an endorsement to thateffect.2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel for thepetitioner, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd./- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / TRUE COPY/ SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR sslToThe Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam+ 1 cc to Mr. N.Dilipkumar, Advocate in SR 19389/2012rr/06.07.20121p:3cCrl.R.C.(MD) No.202 of 201121.06.2012
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.