Noordeen P v. The Commissioner
Case at a glance
- Bench
- G JAYACHANDRAN
Outcome
Dismissed
In the result, the present writ petitions are dismissed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Thus, we hold that though the writ petitioners might have been put into place as tenant by the HR & CE Department, their very presence in the antique mandapam is in violation of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 and…
- Para 66. In the result, the present writ petitions are dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. [G.J., J.] & [K.K.R.K., J.] 10.02.2026 Index :Yes/NoInternet: YestaTo1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungampakkam…
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 10.02.2026CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRANANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNANW.P.(MD)Nos.27507 to 27514, 27948 and 27949 of 2025andW.M.P.(MD)Nos.21397, 21398, 21407, 21408, 21500, 21502, 21409, 21411, 21405, 21406, 21399, 21401, 21403, 21404, 21703 and 21704Noordeen P ... Petitioner in WP(MD27507/ 2025 S.Suthan ... Petitioner in WP(MD)27508/ 2025N.Mohamed Sulaiman... Petitioner in WP(MD)27509/ 2025N.Mohamed Sulaiman... Petitioner in WP(MD)27510/ 2025 Seiva Chidambaram... Petitioner in WP(MD) 27511/ 2025P.Murugan ... Petitioner in WP(MD)27512/ 2025 Murugan M ... Petitioner in WP(MD)27513/ 2025 M.Katchi Mohamed ... Petitioner in WP(MD)27514/20251/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis J.Kamlesh Kumar N... Petitioner in WP(MD)27948/ 2025P.Muthu Kumar ... Petitioner in WP(MD) 27949/ 2025Vs.
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungampakkam, Chennai.
The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Kanyakumari District, Office at Suchindram - 629 704.
Nagarajan ... Respondents W.P.(MD)No.27507 to 27514/ 2025 The Joint Commissioner / Executive Officer, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Kanyakumari District Temples, Suchindram – 629704.... Respondents in WP(MD)27948 & 27949/ 2025COMMON PRAYER:- Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the order passed by the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka. No.2447/2025/D3 dated 25.09.2025 and quash the same.2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis In W.P.(MD)Nos.27507 to 27514 of 2025:For Petitioner : Mr.P.T.Ramesh RajaFor Respondents: Mr.J.Ashok (R1 & R2) Additional Government PleaderIn W.P.(MD)Nos.27948 & 27949 of 2025:For Petitioner : Mr.R.MuraliFor Respondent: Mr.J.Ashok Additional Government PleaderCOMMON ORDER (Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.)Notices issued by the Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer to remove the structures put up by the petitioners in and around Mandapam of Arulmigu Bhagavathi Amman thirukovil, Kanniyakumari, pursuant to the direction of this Court dated 22.06.2025 in W.P.(MD)No.26210 of 2025, are placed under challenge, in these writ petitions. 2. The contention of the petitioners is that the shops in and around the Kanniyambalam Mandapam, was legally let out by the HR & CE Department for rent and they are carrying on business for the past 20 years. Their livelihood depends on the income from the shop. Therefore, they cannot be evicted without following due process. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3. We are shocked to see how an ancient structure containing sculptures with excellent artistic work has been let out for rent by the HR & CE Department unmindful of their responsibility to protect the antique structure. The Joint Commissioner had involved in exploiting the temple property for financial gain. The writ petitioners can have no right to damage the antique and ancient structures on the strength of the illegal permission granted by the Joint Commissioner, HR & CE. Even a day more, allowing them to be in the mandapam, would continue the dereliction of the building.
Thus, we hold that though the writ petitioners might have been put into place as tenant by the HR & CE Department, their very presence in the antique mandapam is in violation of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 and hence, they are necessarily to be removed to protect the ancient monument.
The tenants/writ petitioners shall vacate /remove their shops in Kaniyambalam Mandapam on their own, failing which the Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Kanyakumari District, shall take necessary action for removing them from the premises. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Operative part
In the result, the present writ petitions are dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. [G.J., J.] & [K.K.R.K., J.] 10.02.2026 Index :Yes/NoInternet: YestaTo1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungampakkam, Chennai. 2. The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Kanyakumari District, Office at Suchindram - 629 704.5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis DR. G. JAYACHANDRAN , J. ANDK.K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.taW.P.(MD)Nos.27507 to 27514, 27948 and 27949 of 202510.02.20266/6
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In the result, the present writ petitions are dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.