Muthukutti v. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District.2.State
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
In view of the submission and endorsement made, this Petitionis dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
1BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 31.10.2012CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESHCrl.O.P(MD) No.7486 of 2011 Muthukutti ... Petitioner Vs.
The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District.
State rep.by Sub Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District.
Nagavalli... RespondentsThis petition is preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C to direct thefirst respondent to take blood samples of myself, third respondent and herchild to send them for DNA testing to any of the following centre (1)centre for cellur and molecular biology, Hyderabad-500 007. (2) Centre foDNA finger printing and diagnostics, Hyderabad – 500 076. (3) Centralforensic science laboratory, Calcutta-700 014 or anyother research centrefixed by this Court. For Petitioner: M/s.R.Pon Karthikeyan For R.1&2: Mr.K.V.Rajarajan Govt. Advocate. (Crl. Side)
Operative part
O R D E RThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permissionof this Court to withdraw this Petition. He has also made an endorsementto that effect. 2. In view of the submission and endorsement made, this Petitionis dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(Accounts) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District. 2. The Sub Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Crl.O.P(MD).No.7486 of 201131.10.2012ssmPBK 16/11/2012 ::1P-4C::
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the submission and endorsement made, this Petitionis dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.