J.P.KAVIARASU @ VAIPAV SARAN KAVI v. 1 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MADURAI DISTRICT,MADURAI.2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120(B), 406, 420
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTFriday, the Fifteenth day of July Two Thousand ElevenPRESENTThe Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALACRL OP(MD) No.6818 of 2011J.P.KAVIARASU @ VAIPAV SARAN KAVI ... PETITIONER Vs1 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MADURAI DISTRICT,MADURAI.2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH MADURAI. ..RESPONDENTSPetition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased TODIRECT THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO REGISTER THE COMPLAINT DATED 26/04/11PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION406, 420, 120(B) IPC. AND TO TAKE ACTION ASGAINST THE ACCUSED INACCORDANCE WITH LAW.To:The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. Whereas it is expedient in the interest of Justice that the Personal appearance of the Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai, is necessary before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai at 10.30 a.m., on MONDAY THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWOTHOUSAND AND ELEVEN (18.07.2011)In this connection you namely, The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai, be and hereby are directed to appear in person before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai at 10.30 a.m., on MONDAY THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWOTHOUSAND AND ELEVEN (18.07.2011).Herein fail not. Witness the Honourable Thiru. M. YUSUF EQBAL, The Chief Justiceof the High Court of Judicature at Madras on Friday the Fifteenth day of July Two Thousand and Eleven. Assistant Registrar (T and P) ORDER DATED: 15.07.2011 HEARING DATE: 18.07.2011SUMMONS CRL OP(MD) No.6818 of 2011DM::2011:JULY::15:: 1P:3C::
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.