VASANTH @ VASANTHAPANDIYAN v. STATE
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing forthe petitioner, this petition is dismissed as not pressed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )Tuesday, the Eleventh day of October Two Thousand ElevenPRESENTThe Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHUCRL OP(MD) No.6552 of 2011VASANTH @ VASANTHAPANDIYAN ... PETITIONER
/ACCUSED NO.9 VsSTATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KUTRALAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.355/2011 ... RESPONDENT
/COMPLAINANTFor Petitioner : M/S. B.JAMEELARASU AdvocateFor Respondent : MR. K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER :
The Court Made the following order :-In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing forthe petitioner, this petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- 11/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICEKUTRALAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTORMADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.6552 of 2011 Date :11/10/2011TR :14.10.2011: 1p/3c
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing forthe petitioner, this petition is dismissed as not pressed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.