✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Hence this petition is dismissed

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. The Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents/complainants. This petition is preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C to direct thefirst respondent to file the final report in respect of Cr.No.16 of 2009 onthe file of the first respondent police at Nagercoil before the JudicialMagistrate…

Judgment

1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED:29.10.2011 CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Original Petition (MD) No.5654 of 2011 Antoviji ... Petitioner Vs1.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

2.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

Operative part

3.

The Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents/complainants. This petition is preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C to direct thefirst respondent to file the final report in respect of Cr.No.16 of 2009 onthe file of the first respondent police at Nagercoil before the JudicialMagistrate No.2, immediately. For Petitioner :Mr.L.Victoria GowriFor Respondents :Mr.P.Kannidevn, Govt. Advocate(Crl. Side) ORDERSeeking a direction for filing final report in Cr.No.16 of 2009, thepetitioner, has come up with the present petition. 2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that inCr.No.16 of 2009, investigation has been completed and charge sheet has beenlaid on 07.07.2011.3.In view of the above submission, nothing survives in thispetition. Hence this petition is dismissed. Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(A.S)/TRUE COPY / SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vsTo1.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

4.

The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.SB 21.11.2011 Crl.O.P.(md).No.5654 of 2011.

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence this petition is dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments