✦ Madras High Court

R.SUBHA v. STATE

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Cause title

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )Monday, the Eleventh day of April Two Thousand ElevenPRESENTThe Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.S.RAMANATHANCRL OP(MD) No.4756 of 2011R.SUBHA ... PETITIONER

VsSTATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MUSIRI, TRICHY DIST ... RESPONDENT

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and inthe affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased TODIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO REGISTER THE PETITIONER'S COMPLAINT DT.19.02.2011.

ORDER :

This petition coming on for orders upon perusingthe petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and uponhearing the arguments of M/S. VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate for thepetitioner, and of MR. L. MURUGAN, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE, ( CRL. SIDE)for the Respondent, the court made the following order: The petitioner gave a complaint against her husband and in – laws andas the respondent police did not register a case, this petition is filed.

2.

The learned Government Advocate submitted that originally a casehas been registered by the Thuraiyur police Station on the complaint givenby the petitioner against her husband and in-laws under Sections 323, 506(ii) of IPC., and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and that matter hasbeen referred to Social Welfare Officer.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that before the Social Welfare Officer, her husband and in-laws made false promises andbelieving them, the petitioner went with her husband and thereafter, herhusband and in-laws started ill-treating her.

4.

Considering the allegations made in the petition, in my view it isa fit case for referring the same to the Mediation and the Registry isdirected to refer the matter to Mediation and Conciliation Centre, MaduraiBench. sd/- 11/04/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)TO1 INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MUSIRI, TRICHY DIST2 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI3 THE CHIEF CO ORDINATER, MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION CENTE, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI.DM:2011::APRIL:19::: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.4756 of 2011 Date :11/04/20111P:4C:

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments