Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Recording the same, this Petition is dismissed giving libertyto approach the Jurisdictional Court
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 294B, 307, 326, 506(i)
- Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 s. 3(1)(x)
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Recording the same, this Petition is dismissed giving libertyto approach the Jurisdictional Court. Sd/-Assistant Registrar (CO)/True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2vsgTo1.The Superintendent of PoliceTiruchirappalli DistrictTiruchirappalli2.The Inspector of PoliceLalgudi Police StationTiruchirappalli District3.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court MaduraiCrl.O.P.(MD).No.16879 of…
Judgment
1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 18.10.2012CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESHCrl.O.P.(MD).No.16879 of 2011 Muruganantham... Petitioner Vs.
The Superintendent of PoliceTiruchirappalli DistrictTiruchirappalli.
The Inspector of PoliceLalgudi Police StationTiruchirappalli District.... RespondentsPRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the 2nd respondent to incorporateSection 307 of IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act in the FIRregistered in Cr.No. 312/2011 on the file of the Lalgudi Police Stationin addition to Sections 294(b) 326 and 506(i) of the IPC and thus renderjustice. For Petitioner : Mr.T.M.Madasamy For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)
O R D E RHeard both sides.2. The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the offences punishableunder Sections 294B, 326 and 506(i) of IPC in Cr.No.312 of 2011 on thefile of the respondent police, move this Petition seeking direction tothe 2nd respondent to incorporate Section 307 of IPC and Section 3(1)(x)of the SC/ST Act in the FIR registered in Cr.No. 312/2011 on the file ofthe Lalgudi Police Station in addition to Sections 294(b) 326 and 506(i)of the IPC and thus render justice.
The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit thatthe charge sheet has been filed and the same was taken on file before thejurisdictional Magistrate and four witnesses have been examined.
Operative part
Recording the same, this Petition is dismissed giving libertyto approach the Jurisdictional Court. Sd/-Assistant Registrar (CO)/True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2vsgTo1.The Superintendent of PoliceTiruchirappalli DistrictTiruchirappalli2.The Inspector of PoliceLalgudi Police StationTiruchirappalli District3.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court MaduraiCrl.O.P.(MD).No.16879 of 201118.10.2012rg/02/11/2012 2p/4c
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the same, this Petition is dismissed giving libertyto approach the Jurisdictional Court
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 294B, 307, 326, 506(i); Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — s. 3(1)(x).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.